If you are opposing counsel of Lindborg and Mazor LLP, we are glad you found us and hope we are helpful in your cause. You can find all the filings screen shot below under David Mazor-Krubinski v Parex LaHabra in Orange County CA Superior Court online system. I have many filings and am happy to share whole filings with you if you would like a copy.
Opposing counsel in law suits are of course, your opponents. They are representing the party that you are suing or being sued by. Yet there are codes of conduct, both written and unwritten. between counsel. You address one another formally, respectfully, even if you hate that person…it’s beneath most attorneys to get dirty. You work hard for your client, represent them appropriately, carry out your duty as their agent with civility and adhering to the code of ethics you swore to uphold when you became an attorney.
For instance, you don’t appear at Parex offices unannounced with your client and unfilled lawsuits in hand threatening to file them and demanding “blood” , apparently, according to a court filing (see below) demanding an immediate payoff. That’s called intimidation Peter Lindborg and Irina Mazor…and the word Grifters again floats to the top of my mind.
What you don’t do, without a shred of evidence, is accuse opposing counsel of knowing about or orchestrating a “burglary” of your clients office or the office of a “3rd party witness” or allude that your clients mailbox was “rifled” after their deposition where they said they received business mail.
Opposing counsel of Lindborg & Drill don’t expect letters from you Irina, basically saying without saying it, that a highly reputable firm with credentials and reputation that is so far above yours, caused robberies to be done, supposedly only stealing documents critical to the case. It all stinks.
We have a near 3 hour long tape of Mario Ramirez discussing WICR… Here we are dropping another sampling down on ya. you can listen at this link. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZoFChXPV5-HMgB__ut-L-UNRrsGFMEGu/view?usp=sharing It will open on a new page. There’s a lot that Mario drops on this tape and a copy has been provided to CSLB for that complaint I filed against you…Mario talks a lot btw.
As to you Peter Lindborg; is Irina the type of attorney you want to be associated with? I asked several attorneys I know if they ever have seen such a letter of reprimand from opposing counsel or motions like these below filed in court. Never was their unanimous answer.
If you saw that from someone in your firm what would happen I asked? They would be terminated…again unanimous. I am not a lawyer, but it appears Peter may be in breach of Rule 1.7 C1 on any matters pertaining to WICR, David Mazor, Mark Marsch etc.
Irina may have issues of her own…at any rate the American Bar Association has this to say about misconduct- “Misconduct by a lawyer whenever it occurs reflects upon the lawyer’s fitness.” We agree.
And so everyone clearly understands; Peter Lindborg represents WICR on most matters these days, and will not tell you that his partner Irina Mazor is married to WICR Waterproofing’s owner David Mazor. If you are considering litigation against WICR then carefully read the documents under Mazor-Krubinski vs Parex LaHabra. Their game is to stretch things out for years and cost you a lot of money. Don’t play their game.
Instead of that, in many cases, if you are having problems with WICR, your easiest resolution will come about by filing a complaint against them with the CSLB and letting them handle the investigation. WICR already has a letter of admonishment on their Complaint Disclosure at their license listing. More complaints will trigger closer examination of complaints.
Let WICR’s attorneys fight the State Attorney General’s office as they represent CSLB in any legal matters. Make sure you claim all costs for the original work, costs of investigation/attorney, costs to repair. Inquire with your counsel on those matters. Meantime, take a look at the legal filings and letters that were filed in the case. As a honorable, ethical professional, you’ll be horrified as I am. I can’t believe opposing counsel didn’t file a complaint with the State Bar over this.
Dear Dave, Peter and Irina, I’ll bet you all thought it a great joke to send that letter to my employer didn’t you? True to form you use extortion disguised as threat to bring a lawsuit if you aren’t paid 500K for “damages” to WICR? Well guess what? It might be if you all didn’t have issues that need unearthing and I can cost you a whole lot more than you can cost me. I have emails from David saying this website actually brings him business but your letter says it’s hurting WICR. Which is it? You can’t have both. But your firm and the client you represent have made a Faustian bargain…and sitting in that courtroom in San Bernardino across from you and David, I could see it written on your face.
You and Irina tried to extort Parex La-Habra and that folded like a wet paper bag on you…smarter lawyers than you destroyed David in the first round of his deposition and there was no way you could put him in the chair again…Parex’ lawyers smelled blood in the water.
Did you or Irina know about this robbery at WICR and David’s office? It seems way to coincidental doesn’t it? And then Irina actually has the gall to accuse the opposing side of the crime? We heard that Mario stored boxes containing Mer-Kote information at his house and later on moved them to Palm Springs. What we don’t know is who organized the crime and was there a conspiracy to commit the crime and make a false police report? Who would be involved with such a conspiracy if it existed? Who would have innocent people become involved in the crime if it existed?
When opposing counsel and prospective clients see this information what might that cost be when clients evaporate Peter? Opposing counsel is going to embarrass you, maybe seek to get you taken off a huge case, perform deeper investigations on your client and you, use these documents against you. You all know that game dontcha? I’m guessing you will lose half a million in income in 2021. Maybe more who knows. I think I’ll also send it to the ABA for their perusal.
Lesson to you 3-there are always unintended consequences to your actions. Hit me, I hit back harder. Cheers! Have fun explaining away all this to everyone who asks…