all of WICR’s Litigation History

We’ve been searching through all the local LA, Riverside, San Diego and Orange County Superior Court public records for WICR’s litigation history, and boy oh boy do they have a lot! While there is always 2 sides to every lawsuit, it seems the predominant trait of WICR’s lawsuits are because someone didn’t want to pay them. Many suits allege defective work…

Looking at this long long list, one has to ask themselves, how do I avoid a lawsuit with WICR?

What do you think? Reply in the comments how you’d avoid a suit between you and WICR.

RECENT NOTABLE CASES ARE LISTED FIRST

We found a few recent cases currently winding their way through the courts…we thought you should be aware of them and be able to read the complaints and cross-complaints.

David Mazor-Krubinski v Parex LaHabra

In 2007 David Mazor AKA David Krubinski was released from Parex La Habra shortly after Parex aquired Mer-Kote Products. It is a fascinating case and there are tons of filings by both parties. I’ll be going through several thousand pages searching for the juiciest bits to serve up here…meantime, feel free to read through all the documents listed below. First impressions-Krubinski was Wake’s partner starting in 1997 and according to the filing may still be as of 2007…and received a “consulting fee” each and every month from Wanke. This is all at the same time he is employed by Mer-Kote Products selling their waterproofing systems. Coincidentally, WICR won a lot of Navy contracts during this time period…how? That’s what we want to know…probably by selling the Mer-Kote Products to WICR cheaper than he was to there competitors of WICR’s.

In a fascinating case, Wetherly HOA v WICR, there’s some very interesting allegations to take note of…. “Fred is a tool”, David Mazor is the hidden actual owner of WICR etc…click through the gallery for highlights.

IN WICR v CANNON CONSTRUCTORS, WICR is claiming Cannon didn’t pay them for work completed, to the tune of around 160k. Cannon’s cross complaint alleges defective work with damages exceeding 160k. Currently awaiting trial.

In BEDROS v WICR, WICR is claiming Bedros owes them money, Bedros claims they damaged his property for 125k+.

BEDROS ALLEGES DECEIT BY DAVID MAZOR

In LaBelle Monique HOA v WICR, the Association alleges WICR’s work was defective and caused over 100k in damages to their structures as a result. WICR denies that and is counterclaim information for their payment and damages.

Here’s a messy case, involving ICR Services and Nevada Coatings, David Krubinski AKA David Mazors companies…this just helps to show that Mark Marsch and David Mazor have their fingers in lots of pies…so caveat emptor eh?

WICR Hates This-TRUTH IS A COMPLETE DEFENSE AGAINST LIABILITY FOR DEFAMATION, REGARDLESS OF BAD FAITH OR MALICIOUS PURPOSE from Krubinski vs Schmutzer lawsuit

%d bloggers like this: