If you are opposing counsel of Lindborg and Mazor LLP, we are glad you found us and hope we are helpful in your cause. You can find all the filings screen shot below under David Mazor-Krubinski v Parex LaHabra at the Orange County CA Superior Courts online system. I have many filings and am happy to share whole filings with you if you would like a copy.
If you are considering hiring the firm, you may wish to consider this information we recently turned up in a suit alleging General Negligence.
Considering hiring the firm? Read this lawsuit claim against them first…
Opposing counsel in law suits are of course, your opponents. They are representing the party that you are suing or being sued by. Yet there are codes of conduct, both written and unwritten. between counsel. You address one another formally, respectfully, even if you hate that person…it’s beneath most attorneys to get dirty. You work hard for your client, represent them appropriately, carry out your duty as their agent with civility and adhering to the code of ethics you swore to uphold when you became an attorney.
Grifter-defined as “a person who engages in petty or small scale swindling” by the Oxford Dictionary. Small scale may not apply here but the word Grifters certainly feels right…to describe these people involved. They ain’t gonna like being called grifters, but hey, we’re entitled to our opinions under the First Amendment.
So you’ll want to go check out our newest page on WICR’s List of Grift as we gleefully call it….
Meantime, here’s some juicy goodness about Lindborg & Mazor LLP where opposing counsel filed for monetary sanctions against them and had to write a letter to Irina Mazor regarding slanderous statements she made. For clients of this firm or potential clients, one really has to ask themselves of this is the type of firm you want representing you?
We have many of the documents filed during a lawsuit David Mazor filed against Parex-LaHabra after he was discharged from the firm after they took over Mer-Kote Systems. There are tons of filings, many hundreds of pages long, one is 1700+ pages, the second amended complaint filed by Krubinski.
These filing provide a great insight into Dave’s activities and involvement with WICR, indeed, one highlight as seen below is that Krubinsk was and may still be been a partner of Fred Wanke’s since 1997 and received monthly consulting fees every month since 1997.
Another highlight is the inference that Irina Drill (now Irina Mazor) may have tampered with witnesses.
In A David Vs Goliath Lawsuit, David is Getting The Better of Goliath
WICR Waterproofing’s Attorneys Filing Attacks WICRLeaks as “Vituperative”
Describe themselves as “good people”. Hysterical they’re just like Donald Trump with their victim complex.
A recent filing by WICR Waterproofing’s attorney in a case before the court in San Bernadino may reveal WICR’s deep seated fear of this website.
In WICR Waterproofing vs Arceneaux, the defendants informed WICR’s attorneys that I am their expert/consultant. The reply back from Lindborg & Drill is pretty revealing. They, as well as WICR’s David Mazor, know very well that if I testify or provide an affadavit, that my information could prove to be very damaging to WICR and David Mazor.
The 23 page filing includes the following from Lindborg & Drill
WICR in Pursuit of a $1.3 Million Judgement for Damages
Bankruptcy Filing by Keck Prevented Collection
Years of Appeals Later, Court Affirms Keck’s Debt is Dischargeable in Bankruptcy
WICR just won’t give up hope of collecting a judgement from an ex-employee of theirs. Scott Keck and WICR have been battling for years with Keck’s lawyers getting the best of WICR’s attorneys time after time.
On March 5th the Court issued a ruling regarding the dischargeablity of the judgement in bankruptcy, affirming the bankruptcy courts finding that the debt is dischargeable. https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20200309737 This link takes you to a copy of the decision on another website.