Mark Marsch holds himself up as an “independent consultant”. Perhaps he is for many of his own clients, but for his number one client, WICR Waterproofing and Construction he, in our opinion, is not. It’s our opinion that Mark Marsch is squarely in the pocket of David Mazor/David Krubinski.
From various consultant groups I looked at on the web, they all have this common theme…”Avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance thereof and immediately disclose to the clients any circumstances that may influence the consultant’s judgment or objectivity.”
So to show that Marsch has conflicts of interest and/or the appearance thereof…
Below, the final blow to Marsch’s credibility…
We’ve linked Marck Marsch to WICR, where Mark was “President and CEO” in 2004/05 and David Mazor/David Krubisnki was registering WICR Ficticious Business Names in Riverside County.
Mark Marsch and David Krubisnki were also partners in a venture called The Waterproofing Superstore in Flower Mound Texas just outside of Dallas.
Mark Marsch and David Mazor/David Krubisnki are also involved in an outfit called ICR Services, now under Davids name at the CSLB. However, Marsch lists his affiliation with ICR Services as current on his LinkedIn profile.
A recent affadavit sworn by an ex-WICR employee alleges that WICR uses Marsch to dupe clients into believing he is “independent and arbitrary,” but Marsh’s mission, in our opinion, is to cover up the dirt for David’s misdeeds. It takes years to build a reputation but just a second to destroy it. Why would Mark do this? To risk your reputation for what? A little money? You can’t buy a reputation
In Arceneux v WICR, Marsch’s testimony for WICR was deemed to be not as credible as mine was where I testified on behalf of the Arceneaux’s.
In another case, CSLB v DeckTech, Marsch’s testimony was deemed not as credible compared to the CSLB expert’s testimony.
In our opinion, Mark Marsch is not credible, honorable or acting in the manner befitting an Independent consultant. Therefore, we would encourage any clients of WICR’s to not accept any report from Mark Marsch as believable, that it is tainted by an appearance of collusion in any matters regarding WICR.