Tag Archives: David Mazor

David Mazor-Krubinski V Parex LaHabra 2007 Lawsuit

We have many of the documents filed during a lawsuit David Mazor filed against Parex-LaHabra after he was discharged from the firm after they took over Mer-Kote Systems. There are tons of filings, many hundreds of pages long, one is 1700+ pages, the second amended complaint filed by Krubinski.

These filing provide a great insight into Dave’s activities and involvement with WICR, indeed, one highlight as seen below is that Krubinsk was and may still be been a partner of Fred Wanke’s since 1997 and received monthly consulting fees every month since 1997.

Another highlight is the inference that Irina Drill (now Irina Mazor) may have tampered with witnesses.

Despite David Krubinski David Mazor and his company ICR Services sued Parex, Dave didn’t seem to want to submit to a deposition and neither did Fred…wonder why? The defense attorney opined in one email or filing that it seemed that David had no intention of going to a trial, instead he sought to bully, threaten and delay everything in hopes of extracting a settlement.

Shockingly as well, Drill accuses the defense attorney of perhaps orchestrating a break in of WICR’s offices as well as David Mazor, in which the only things taken were documents belonging to Parex…

Head on over to our All of WICR’s Litigation page and I’ll be posting all the documents I have downloaded there for viewing and your reading pleasure.

Mark Marsch is Now Useless to WICR

While the proposed decision of the court after a bench trial in WICR v Arceneaux didn’t come out in financial favor for the Arceneaux’s, it did serve to bury Mark Marsch from ever again being thought of as credible when it comes to being a consultant or expert witness for WICR.

Mark Marsch’s use to David Mazor should be about over with the finding of him having “an implied bias in favor of Plaintiff”

It also taught me a lesson too, I won’t be working for anyone as a witness, even though my testimony was found credible, my bias towards WICR was found to be problematic to the Judge. Lesson is, work with clients in the background encouraging them to file complaints with CSLB. WICR clients reading this, don’t even waste time arguing with WICR, just file if you have problems. CSLB loves dealing with repeat offenders and metes out harsh penalties to them.

Anyway, back to Mark; he’s basically as good as done at WICR. While WICR’s attorney got the Judge to look at this website, the Judge probably also saw information about Mark Marsch that was troubling…his status as an owner of WICR and relationship with David Mazor. And the Judge also found that Marsch’s testimony that the deck was sloped was wrong.

Most damning of all; the Judge found Marsch to have an “implied bias in favor of the plaintiff” (WICR/Mazor). Below is a screen shot from the proposed judgement

Even more troubling for Marsch is that any attorney researching opponents expert witnesses will see this information and be able to question Marsch’s ethics and impartiality. Time to put poor Mark out to pasture as his usefulness is over to WICR.

Congratulations Dave, your pride and arrogance have destroyed Mark Marsch’s name!

WICR’s Sean Krubinski Sued For Causing Injuries to Other Driver in 2018 Accident

A lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court against Sean Krubinski and his wife Noel Davis in July of this year from an accident Krubinski allegedly caused in 2018. The suit asks for unspecified monetary damages to be proved at trial.

The suit alleges that Plaintiff Sarah Gile suffered personal injuries, medical expenses, property damage, wage loss and loss of earning capacity. Typically when a suit alleges loss of earning capacity, the person injured cannot return to work or to the job they performed before the accident.

The accident occurred in Diamond Bar where the plaintiff claims in her suit; “The defendant negligently drove his motor vehicle and collided with plaintiffs vehicle, causing plaintiffs injuries and damages.”

Interestingly Noel Davis is named as well as Does 1-50, which could be anything…but we wonder, was Sean in a WICR vehicle at the time of the crash? Was he intoxicated or high? Did Noel try to pretend she was driving instead of Sean? (probably not she already has a DUI on her record) These questions and more are being asked and we are waiting for answers.

Read the suit by clicking here

Meanwhile, this accident just adds to the lengthy record Krubinski has for driving offenses. Click the link above to see Seans list of driving offenses.

We’re hoping the plaintiff recovers and is healthy, and that Sean Krubinski loses his license, it seems he’s a real danger to other drivers on the road.

Does This Filing by Lindborg & Drill Reveal Their Secret Fear of WICRLeaks?

In A David Vs Goliath Lawsuit, David is Getting The Better of Goliath

WICR Waterproofing’s Attorneys Filing Attacks WICRLeaks as “Vituperative”

Describe themselves as “good people”. Hysterical they’re just like Donald Trump with their victim complex.

A recent filing by WICR Waterproofing’s attorney in a case before the court in San Bernadino may reveal WICR’s deep seated fear of this website.

In WICR Waterproofing vs Arceneaux, the defendants informed WICR’s attorneys that I am their expert/consultant. The reply back from Lindborg & Drill is pretty revealing. They, as well as WICR’s David Mazor, know very well that if I testify or provide an affadavit, that my information could prove to be very damaging to WICR and David Mazor.

The 23 page filing includes the following from Lindborg & Drill

Lindborg drill scared of Bill
The fear is palpable from Lindborg & Drill. They do not want me to testify or supply and affadvait. Understandable, the truth will hurt them badly.

The reply to Lindborg and Drill about the allegations that they’re “being helped”.

defendants reply to drill scared of bill

Well Lindborg & Drill and David Mazor will see my affadavit soon enough, and without ruining the surprise, it will be devastating to them. Truth is a bitch Dave that loves seeing Karma get it’s way. The nerve of you describing yourselves as victims and”good people” is laughable. All you’ve ever done is fail upwards.

With an affadavit comes WICR’s chance to subpoena me, which is something else I’d welcome…first because it would be devastating to them and second because they’d have to pay me…wouldn’t I just love to publish a copy of a WICR or Lindborg check payable to William Leys here? You bet I would!

Catching Up With Mazor’s Non-Profit “Vascular Care Foundation”

Non-Profits are supposed to help people; at least, that’s the stated objective usually right?

The strange Non-Profit known as Vascular Care Foundation is apparently doing nothing at all, at least from what we can see by their tax returns at Pro Publica.

From 92128 Magazine, this fluff piece quotes one founder, Dr Anatoly Bulkin

Dr. Anatoly Bulkin is the founding VCF board member. “In 2014 I started the Vascular Care Foundation because the majority of patients we treat for vascular disease present with late stages of the disease,” reflected Dr. Bulkin. “Through our efforts we are able to find disease earlier and save people’s lives.” He was born in the Ukraine, moved to the states, and graduated from USC Medical School in 1993. He moved to Rancho Bernardo 12 years ago after training at Baylor College of Medicine. Here his family enjoys the open space and proximity to work and outdoor activities. Dr. Bulkin is a surgeon at the San Diego Vascular Center in Escondido.

And from Dr Moldovan “It is also our goal to raise money in order to be able to treat people with vascular problems that do not have the financial capability of obtaining the medical care they need,” added Dr. Moldovan. Approximately 95% of all donations go toward educating people about lifestyle changes and screening efforts. As the program grows VCF can pursue clinical research and advance pioneering technologies in early diagnosis and treatment.”

From the Foundations tax return from 2016, the last filing we can find, they’ve spent $0.00 on anything except expenses including $1695 in legal fees. Guess who their agent for service of process is? Irina Mazor, David Mazor’s wife. Care to take a guess on who probably got that legal fee? Yeah that’s mine too.

So from what we can see, there are zero expenses paid out towards their goal of treating people with Vascular problems.

More mysteriously, who gave the 50k donation and why isn’t that revealed on their tax return?

Who knows, but with no website active that I could find, (VCF did have a cheesy website up before, it still exists at the Way back Machines archives  https://web.archive.org/web/20161103202458/http://vascular-care-foundation.org/our-mission/

and no information on the website anywhere, this operation stinks of a scammy dubious non-profit. We continue to watch for any information and certainly welcome the directors input on what their non-profit is doing exactly. 

With Mazor and Mazor at the helm, not likely we’ll find out. They like their secrets.

2016 expenses


2016 tax return officers

2016 tax return income and expenses