DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SIGN WICR’S CONTRACT. IT IS NOT CONSUMER FRIENDLY, PLACES YOU AT HIGH RISK AND OFFERS YOU ZERO PROTECTION. WICR’S AND DAVID MAZOR IS THE WORST CONTRACTOR TO DO BUSINESS WITH.
CSLB needs complaints to act! If you signed this contract, file a complaint with CSLB immediately! Do not wait, do not try to negotiate, do not let them on your property.
After reading it I realized that what it was saying to me was that Peter Lindborg made serious mistakes by failing to properly redact a document that he filed on behalf of his client.
The article talks about challenges lawyers face… Stating that it is more difficult than it sounds to redact all necessary information; it requires significant attention to detail and ideally layers of review. One of the things that it discusses is wrong ways to redact information which includes changing the font to white blacking out with comment tools or covering text with a black marker… I repeat covering text with a black marker. In numerous filings on a court case involving David Mazor, redacted documents were blacked out using a black marker… And when printed out the blacked out text underneath was often visible, including the email address of a client of WICR. WICR attempted to use this email to show the court, falsely, that they had lost a $50,000 contract. When I realized that I could read the email address of the redacted person I emailed them and was told that they walked away because they had realized that WICR was a problem. Failing to probably redact can lead to the waiver of attorney client privilege, a malpractice lawsuit or even professional discipline.
I love to get fan mail and hear from people regarding WICRleaks.com and how it’s helped save them from making a mistake. Today’s fan mail came from one of my industry peers who shall remain anonymous…
Ending his email with “Keep up the good fight!” our fan also wrote this “I’ve been reading your articles about the issues with WICR and Deck Inspectors Inc. and I applaud you for the effort to expose some of the misdoings that can prove quite disasterous to the unknowing.”
To which I say thank you sir for your email and your email confirms that I’m doing the right thing, shining a light into the dark holes of David Mazor’s greed and grift through Deck Inspectors Inc and WICR Waterproofing.
The problem with liars like David Mazor and his enablers is that they can’t keep their lies from being discovered. Today’s example is sourced from exhibits that WICR themselves submitted to bolster their claim in a small claims case from several years ago in San Bernardino.
In 2013, when David Mazor didn’t own WICR (bad joke, he did own WICR and we have evidence that he was running everything behind the scenes while Fred was the figurehead out in front but was nothing but a straw man), a foreman for WICR, named Ernie Perez, wrote an email in January 2013 regarding an employee of WICR. In that email he states that they were using the employee for structural repair jobs and completing the job from beginning to end. This is interesting because at that time WICR only held a C license as a painter and could not perform structural repairs.
Fast forward to August 13th 2013 and we have a copy of an email from Marina Hughes to David@ICR-services.com (my question is is why would David be getting this email if Fred is the owner of WICR?. Answer, because they are all liars,v David has always been the owner.)
Marina states that she received a call from the contractor state license board about getting verification of experience for a license application… The employee applying for a license stated that he had done general contracting work slash structural repairs while employed with WICR. The investigator wanted to know how he could have general contractor experience if WICR wasn’t a general contractor…
The short answer is they weren’t a licensed general contractor but they performed structural repairs despite being out of class.
Of course WICR denied that the employee had done any structural repairs or general contracting type work while employed with WICR.
However with the Ernie Perez email it certainly points to the likelihood that once again WICR and David Mazor are lying. While this goes back to 2013 it continues to hammer home my point that David and WICR are not to be trusted ever.
It is unfortunate that CSLB probably cannot go back and reopen this matter, as it appears again that WICR and David Mazor committed fraud. Once again we cannot stress enough to stay away from WICR and do business with more reputable companies.
Exposing WICR Waterproofing & Constructions Business Practices