Tag Archives: Fred Wanke

CSLB Takes Disciplinary Action Against WICR Waterproofing

A letter of admonishment has been issued to WICR Waterproofing and Construction by the CSLB for taking an illegal deposit over $1000 from a consumer.

Senate Bill (SB) 486 permits CSLB to issue a letter of admonishment to applicants, licensees, or registrants as an intermediate form of discipline between an advisory notice and a citation. Those who receive a letter can either comply with its terms or contest it in writing. This bill modified Business and Professions Codes (BPC) 7099.2 and 7124.6

We are aware that they related to the same case; however, they are seperate case numbers and outcomes on the specific licenses.

CSLB Moves Our Complaint Against Palm Springs Contractor WICR Waterproofing to Investigations

Recently we noticed that there was something weird about WICR’s corporate filings; they had 2 different listings that raised my suspicions.

I found a fictitious business statement filed years ago by Fred wenke and David krubinski registering WICR as a general partnership. But I also heard Steve Dolan on a podcast discussing that he was made an owner along with seeing a filing with Sean krubinski and Fred wanke filing a general partnership agreement and all this raised my suspicions…

So I gathered up all the evidence that I had including emails that David sent to WICR employees from his ICR account and directing business.

Steve Dolan potentially gave a deposition on a podcast without even realizing it… “So they made me an owner.” Well new owners require the company get a new license… As far as we know according to CSLB.

Also very helpful was the information from the Parex lawsuit that he filed. in there was a statement that said that David had been receiving a consulting fee from Fred since 1997 every month… Lots of stuff to raise suspicions with.

David Mazor-Krubinski V Parex LaHabra 2007 Lawsuit

We have many of the documents filed during a lawsuit David Mazor filed against Parex-LaHabra after he was discharged from the firm after they took over Mer-Kote Systems. There are tons of filings, many hundreds of pages long, one is 1700+ pages, the second amended complaint filed by Krubinski.

These filing provide a great insight into Dave’s activities and involvement with WICR, indeed, one highlight as seen below is that Krubinsk was and may still be been a partner of Fred Wanke’s since 1997 and received monthly consulting fees every month since 1997.

Another highlight is the inference that Irina Drill (now Irina Mazor) may have tampered with witnesses.

San Diego Area HOA’s Problems With WICR

We heard from a San Diego area HOA who told us of their problems with WICR.

WICR entered a contract with this HOA for 6 figures. The contract/bid was done by Fred Wanke last year before he had left.

The contract (which was signed nearly 9 months ago) with the Association did not apparently have a start date (read CSLB’s requirements for contracts here) or finish date. WICR has apparently failed to start the job.

The Association wanted out and told WICR that. Now WICR has sicced their lawyer, Irina Mazor onto them and is demanding “damages”. Continue reading San Diego Area HOA’s Problems With WICR

The Joke Known as Nevada Coatings Inc is Gone From the Web

We’ve ridiculed the Granite Deck System from Nevada Coatings Inc for years. Their system was a cobbled together joke that rapidly failed and with only two applicators, didn’t gain any traction in the market.

Now, a year plus after Decktech Inc of Grover Beach dropped the product, the website for NevadaCoatings.com is gone from the web.

WICR, owned by David Mazor/Krubinski, was the second applicators and they’ve never ever featured a job using the crap on their own website.

If you are a consumer with Granite Deck or any other product from Nevada Coatings Inc and are experiencing failures or difficulty in getting warranty work done, we advise you file a complaint with the California Attorney Generals office for fraud. All claims by the manufacturer were made by the manufacturer and we assert they were false and misleading, without any backing of proof from independent entities.