A letter of admonishment has been issued to WICR Waterproofing and Construction by the CSLB for taking an illegal deposit over $1000 from a consumer.
“Senate Bill (SB) 486 permits CSLB to issue a letter of admonishment to applicants, licensees, or registrants as an intermediate form of discipline between an advisory notice and a citation. Those who receive a letter can either comply with its terms or contest it in writing. This bill modified Business and Professions Codes (BPC) 7099.2 and 7124.6“
We are aware that they related to the same case; however, they are seperate case numbers and outcomes on the specific licenses.
Grifter-defined as “a person who engages in petty or small scale swindling” by the Oxford Dictionary. Small scale may not apply here but the word Grifters certainly feels right…to describe these people involved. They ain’t gonna like being called grifters, but hey, we’re entitled to our opinions under the First Amendment.
So you’ll want to go check out our newest page on WICR’s List of Grift as we gleefully call it….
Meantime, here’s some juicy goodness about Lindborg & Mazor LLP where opposing counsel filed for monetary sanctions against them and had to write a letter to Irina Mazor regarding slanderous statements she made. For clients of this firm or potential clients, one really has to ask themselves of this is the type of firm you want representing you?
We have many of the documents filed during a lawsuit David Mazor filed against Parex-LaHabra after he was discharged from the firm after they took over Mer-Kote Systems. There are tons of filings, many hundreds of pages long, one is 1700+ pages, the second amended complaint filed by Krubinski.
These filing provide a great insight into Dave’s activities and involvement with WICR, indeed, one highlight as seen below is that Krubinsk was and may still be been a partner of Fred Wanke’s since 1997 and received monthly consulting fees every month since 1997.
Another highlight is the inference that Irina Drill (now Irina Mazor) may have tampered with witnesses.
While the proposed decision of the court after a bench trial in WICR v Arceneaux didn’t come out in financial favor for the Arceneaux’s, it did serve to bury Mark Marsch from ever again being thought of as credible when it comes to being a consultant or expert witness for WICR.