I recently received information from an anonymous source who told me that their association has received a reissued report under SB 326 for balcony inspections at his HOA. We understand that in correspondence from the association to it’s members that it says something to the effect that the report has been reissued with the signature of the architect who performed the inspections as the initial report was inadvertently signed by a different engineer.
If you are like me you will find this very suspicious. I queried several engineers and other professionals who have to sign off on documents… And I asked is it possible for you to sign a report that you weren’t meant to sign? Answer was a resounding no because every one of them told me that before they sign anything that they haven’t written but have to sign off on that they read it thoroughly and ensure that it is a report that they can sign. Most said that they prefer to write their own document and sign their own document.
I love to get fan mail and hear from people regarding WICRleaks.com and how it’s helped save them from making a mistake. Today’s fan mail came from one of my industry peers who shall remain anonymous…
Ending his email with “Keep up the good fight!” our fan also wrote this “I’ve been reading your articles about the issues with WICR and Deck Inspectors Inc. and I applaud you for the effort to expose some of the misdoings that can prove quite disasterous to the unknowing.”
To which I say thank you sir for your email and your email confirms that I’m doing the right thing, shining a light into the dark holes of David Mazor’s greed and grift through Deck Inspectors Inc and WICR Waterproofing.
The problem with liars like David Mazor and his enablers is that they can’t keep their lies from being discovered. Today’s example is sourced from exhibits that WICR themselves submitted to bolster their claim in a small claims case from several years ago in San Bernardino.
In 2013, when David Mazor didn’t own WICR (bad joke, he did own WICR and we have evidence that he was running everything behind the scenes while Fred was the figurehead out in front but was nothing but a straw man), a foreman for WICR, named Ernie Perez, wrote an email in January 2013 regarding an employee of WICR. In that email he states that they were using the employee for structural repair jobs and completing the job from beginning to end. This is interesting because at that time WICR only held a C license as a painter and could not perform structural repairs.
Fast forward to August 13th 2013 and we have a copy of an email from Marina Hughes to David@ICR-services.com (my question is is why would David be getting this email if Fred is the owner of WICR?. Answer, because they are all liars,v David has always been the owner.)
Marina states that she received a call from the contractor state license board about getting verification of experience for a license application… The employee applying for a license stated that he had done general contracting work slash structural repairs while employed with WICR. The investigator wanted to know how he could have general contractor experience if WICR wasn’t a general contractor…
The short answer is they weren’t a licensed general contractor but they performed structural repairs despite being out of class.
Of course WICR denied that the employee had done any structural repairs or general contracting type work while employed with WICR.
However with the Ernie Perez email it certainly points to the likelihood that once again WICR and David Mazor are lying. While this goes back to 2013 it continues to hammer home my point that David and WICR are not to be trusted ever.
It is unfortunate that CSLB probably cannot go back and reopen this matter, as it appears again that WICR and David Mazor committed fraud. Once again we cannot stress enough to stay away from WICR and do business with more reputable companies.
UPDATE 5/5/2022-AT THIS TIME THE CSLB HAS CLOSED THE INVESTIGATION AS I DO NOT HAVE A CONTRACT WITH WICR. THEY CAN ONLY INVESTIGATE IF A CONSUMER WITH A CONTRACT WITH WICR COMPLAINS. SO IF YOU HAVE A CONTRACT WITH WICR THAT CONTAINS CLAUSES THAT REQUIRE YOU TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY THEM, WITH THEIR CHOICE OF LAWYERS, OR PLACES A $10,000 PENALTY AGAINST YOU FOR WRITING A NEGATIVE REVIEW ON YELP, YOU SHOULD FILE A COMPLAINT IMMEDIATELY.
The owner and sole author of this blog dedicated to exposing WICR Waterproofing & Construction’s dirty deeds is pleased to announce that his complaint regarding WICR’S contract is moving forward in the CSLB investigations unit.
Correspondence received yesterday informed me that I will hear from CSLB within 20 days. I have maintained that WICR’s contract is predatory and harmful to consumers. You can download it below to read the entire 15+page contract. Between penalties for leaving bad reviews on Yelp, requiring consumers to indemnify and defend the company amongst other clauses that are illegal, immoral, unethical, it is a consumer nightmare.
Coming this week is my story of the fraud committed by David Mazor and his grifting attorneys Irina Mazor and Peter Lindborg of Lindborg& Mazor LLP against Bill Leys and the Los Angeles Superior Court in their quest to shut me upb from speaking the truth. Feel free to download my motion to vacate the default judgment that they got against me due to their fraud. In this document I provide the prima facie evidence of David Mazor committing perjury, producing forged documents and getting caught, being in the unreliable and generally incredible witness which means the judge didn’t believe any of his bullshit… Peter Lindborg and Irina Mazor’s failure to tell the court or their client that they know he is lying under oath and failing to withdraw as his counsel. Why aren’t they withdrawing simple because I have caught them in their own bullshit lies. Look at our website and see what Irina Mazor in particular had been accused of by opposing counsel… Witness tampering causing witnesses to secrete themselves being unreliable unethical and more. Nothing surprising coming out of this group.